Consultancy and training in electromagnetic compatibility

The new EMC Directives

This page gives you a brief overview of the new Directives which appeared in late 2004. These are second editions of the EMC Directive 89/336/EC and of the Automotive EMC Directive 95/54/EC.

Last updated on 26th January 2005

The 2nd edition EMC Directive

The 2nd edition Automotive EMC Directive


DIRECTIVE 2004/108/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 December 2004 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and repealing Directive 89/336/EEC

This Directive was published on 31st December 2004 in OJEU number L/390, pages 24-37. The full text can be found via Eur-Lex. A page describing the process of production of this Directive on the EC's website can be found here.

The second edition was begun as a result of the SLIM review (Simpler Legislation in the Internal Market) of the first edition of the EMCD (89/336/EEC). The timescale for adoption laid out in the second edition is as follows:

What changes?

The essential requirements have not changed except for detailed wording, particularly that immunity now requires operation "without unacceptable degradation of its intended use". The routes to compliance however have been changed. Whereas before, if you didn't "apply" harmonised standards you had to use the Technical Construction File route and pass your TCF by a Competent Body, now, the TCF route has been swept away. The overarching requirement is for the manufacturer to perform and document an "EMC assessment" of his product. This may still involve compliance with harmonised standards: "The correct application of all the relevant harmonised standards whose references have been published in the OJEU shall be equivalent to the carrying out of the electromagnetic compatibility assessment." But it is also made clear that "Compliance with a ‘harmonised standard’ is not compulsory", and the "presumption of conformity" which compliance offers is limited to the scope of the harmonised standard(s) applied and the relevant essential requirements covered by such harmonised standard(s).

The real change here is that, if you don't apply correctly all the relevant harmonised standards, you can, indeed must, still carry out an EMC assessment; but there is no requirement to have this assessment reviewed by a third party such as a competent body. On the other hand, you may do so voluntarily, and the Directive allows for "Notified Bodies" to be appointed on pretty much identical terms to the old Directive's Competent Bodies, so that these organisations will almost certainly continue to offer their services under the new Directive. Their use, though, will be entirely at the manufacturer's discretion.

The other major change is to the regime for fixed installations. Equipment that is regulated by the Directive now has two subsets: apparatus, and fixed installations. The change allows different regulatory provisions for each. "Apparatus" now covers virtually everything that was covered by the old Directive, including mobile installations, and any finished appliance or combination thereof made commercially available as a single functional unit, intended for the end user and liable to generate or be affected by electromagnetic disturbance; such apparatus is subject to the full provisions of the Directive, but there is an explicit exemption now for benign apparatus.

Fixed installations

"‘Fixed installation’ means a particular combination of several types of apparatus and, where applicable, other devices, which are assembled, installed and intended to be used permanently at a predefined location". A fixed installation has to be installed applying "good engineering practices" and respecting the information on the intended use of its components, with a view to meeting the protection requirements. Those good engineering practices shall be documented and the documentation shall be held by the person(s) responsible for as long as the fixed installation is in operation. However, fixed installations do not need to be CE marked or subject to a declaration of conformity. Also, apparatus that is intended for incorporation into a specified (named) fixed installation – and not otherwise commercially available to an end user as a single functional unit – does not have to comply with

This represents a significant change in the way that fixed installations and the apparatus that goes into them are regulated. Not all of the implications are yet clear, but one is that operators of installations will have to designate a "responsible person" who has responsibility for the establishment of compliance of a fixed installation with the relevant essential requirements. This will be new to most if not all such operators. Another is that the vague term "good engineering practices" will have to be fleshed out; at present there are no harmonised standards for installations, but the Commission clearly envisages that some will have to be created.

[Back to top]


COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2004/104/EC of 14 October 2004 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 72/245/EEC relating to the radio interference (electromagnetic compatibility) of vehicles and amending Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers

This Directive was published on 13th November 2004 in OJEU number L/337, pages 13-58. The EC's Automotive industry website gives brief details. The full text of the Directive can be found via Eur-Lex. The timescale for adoption laid out in the second edition is as follows:

What changes?

The main modifications are: There are other detailed issues which should not be overlooked. Particularly for vehicle manufacturers, "The vehicle manufacturer must provide a statement of frequency bands, power levels, antenna positions and installation provisions for the installation of RF-transmitters, even if the vehicle is not equipped with RF transmitter at time of type-approval. This should cover all mobile radio services normally used in vehicles. This information must be made publicly available following the type-approval. Vehicle manufacturers must provide evidence that vehicle performance is not adversely affected by such transmitter installations." The issue of after-market fitment of radio transmitters (not just mobile cellphones) is clearly a live one.

The confusion over spot frequency emissions testing has been removed. Spot frequency testing is only required if the Technical Service has to validate test evidence supplied for inclusion in the type approval.

[Back to top]


Elmac Services does not claim this briefing to be definitive or complete, but we present it as an aid to understanding the impact of the recent changes. Please contact us if you would like a consultancy visit to discuss compliance, design or test issues relating to your products.

Back to home page Elmac Services, Wareham, Dorset - Phone 01929 558279 Contact:
E-mail form